The Revolt of the Angels — Key Ideas to Explore
Edition facts
The catalog record for The Revolt of the Angels — Key Ideas to Explore provides practical reading context through 77,221 words, 5 hr 36 min estimated reading time, and 10 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 20.3 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “French fiction -- Translations into English,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Fulgence had three sons. The eldest, Marc-Alexandre, entering the army, made a splendid career for himself: he was a good speaker. The second, Gaétan, showing no particular aptitude for anything, lived mostly in the country, where he hunted, bred horses, and devoted himself to music and painting. The third son, René, destined from his childhood for the law, resigned his deputyship to avoid complicity in the Ferry decrees against the religious orders; and later, perceiving the revival under the presidency of Monsieur Fallières of the days of Decius and Diocletian, put his knowledge and zeal at the service of the persecuted Church.
From the Concordat of 1801 down to the closing years of the Second Empire all the d'Esparvieus attended mass for the sake of example. Though sceptics in their inmost hearts, they looked upon religion as an instrument of government.
Mark and René were the first of their race to show any sign of sincere devotion. The General, when still a colonel, had dedicated his regiment to the Sacred Heart, and he practised his faith with a fervour remarkable even in a soldier, though we all know that piety, daughter of Heaven, has marked out the hearts of the generals of the Third Republic as her chosen dwelling-place on earth.
Faith has its vicissitudes. Under the old order the masses were believers, not so the aristocracy or the educated middle class. Under the First Empire the army from top to bottom was entirely irreligious. To-day the masses believe nothing. The middle classes wish to believe, and succeed at times, as did Marc and René d'Esparvieu. Their brother Gaétan, on the contrary, the country gentleman, failed to attain to faith. He was an agnostic, a term commonly employed by the modish to avoid the odious one of freethinker. And he openly declared himself an agnostic, contrary to the admirable custom which deems it better to withhold the avowal.
In the century in which we live there are so many modes of belief and of unbelief that future historians will have difficulty in finding their way about. But are we any more successful in disentangling the condition of religious beliefs in the time of Symmachus or of Ambrose?
A fervent Christian, René d'Esparvieu was deeply attached to the liberal ideas his ancestors had transmitted to him as a sacred heritage. Compelled to oppose a Jacobin and atheistical Republic, he still called himself Republican. And it was in the name of liberty that he demanded the independence and sovereignty of the Church.
During the long debates on the Separation and the quarrels over the Inventories, the synods of the bishops and the assemblies of the faithful were held in his house. While the most authoritatively accredited leaders of the Catholic party: prelates, generals, senators, deputies, journalists, were met together in the big green drawing-room, and every soul present turned towards Rome with a tender submission or enforced obedience; while Monsieur d'Esparvieu, his elbow on the marble chimney-piece, opposed civil law to canon law, and protested eloquently against the spoliation of the Church of France, two faces of other days, immobile and speechless, looked down on the modern crowd; on the right of the fire-place, painted by David, was Romain Bussart, a working-farmer at Esparvieu in shirt-sleeves and drill trousers, with a rough-and-ready air not untouched with cunning. He had good reason to smile: the worthy man laid the foundation of the family fortunes when he bought Church lands. On the left, painted by Gérard in full-dress bedizened with orders, was the peasant's son, Baron Emile Bussart d'Esparvieu, prefect under the Empire, Keeper of the Great Seal under Charles X, who died in 1837, churchwarden of his parish, with couplets from _La Pucelle_ on his lips.
René d'Esparvieu married in 1888 Marie-Antoinette Coupelle, daughter of Baron Coupelle, ironmaster at Blainville (Haute Loire). Madame René d'Esparvieu had been president since 1903 of the Society of Christian Mothers. These perfect spouses, having married off their eldest daughter in 1908, had three children still at home--a girl and two boys.
Léon, the younger, aged seven, had a room next to his mother and his sister Berthe. Maurice, the elder, lived in a little pavilion comprising two rooms at the bottom of the garden. The young man thus gained a freedom which enabled him to endure family life. He was rather good-looking, smart without too much pretence, and the faint smile which merely raised one corner of his mouth did not lack charm.
The novel opens with a meticulous genealogy of the d'Esparvieu family, tracing their political and religious accommodations from 1789 to the present. This grounding in French bourgeois history establishes a contrast between earthly power and the celestial rebellion to come. The angel Arcade, who appears in the family library, embodies this tension: he is both a product of human learning and a divine being questioning his origins.
France uses the d'Esparvieu household as a microcosm of institutional religion—outwardly devout, inwardly skeptical. The narrative voice is dry and ironic, noting that earlier generations 'attended mass for the sake of example' while being 'sceptics in their inmost hearts.' This pattern of hypocrisy sets the stage for Arcade's revolt, which challenges not just Heaven but the earthly structures that mirror it.
The Architecture of Rebellion
The physical setting of the d'Esparvieu mansion—'beneath the shadow of St. Sulpice'—is more than backdrop. Its 'austere three stories' and 'moss-grown fore-court' suggest a world of settled tradition, yet the garden is 'hemmed in' by 'ever loftier and more intrusive buildings.' This spatial compression mirrors the intellectual constraints that Arcade will reject. The family's history of political maneuvering—from a Vice-President under the July Monarchy to a senator who 'made a remarkable speech in favour of the temporal power of the popes'—shows how faith is used as an instrument of governance. Arcade's rebellion is thus not merely theological but architectural: he seeks to break out of the enclosed garden of received belief.
Voices of Dissent: Dialogue and Debate
The excerpted passage features a long, lyrical speech by an unnamed speaker (likely Arcade) that contrasts the 'Pax Romana' with the rise of 'Iahveh.' The speaker employs a classical education to dismantle Christian claims, calling the deity 'the persecutor of the laborious demons' and accusing him of 'cunning' in inventing the doctrine of atonement. The tone is erudite and mocking: 'It is not credible that a penalty should redress a fault.' This rhetorical strategy—using the language of the oppressor against him—is central to the novel's method. France does not simply reject religion; he has his characters argue from within its own traditions, citing Greek philosophy and Roman history to expose contradictions. The debate format allows multiple perspectives, though the excerpts suggest a clear sympathy for the rebels.
The Angel as Reader and Critic
Arcade is introduced not in Heaven but in a library, surrounded by the books of the d'Esparvieu collection. This detail is crucial: the angel's rebellion is sparked by reading. He absorbs human knowledge—history, philosophy, science—and turns it against his creator. The novel thus presents intellectual inquiry as inherently subversive. The speaker's reference to 'the teaching of Dionysus and the Muses' as a standard of civilization implies that art and reason are older and more noble than Judeo-Christian revelation. France's angels are not ethereal beings but critics, scholars, and rhetoricians. Their revolt is a war of ideas fought with quotations and allusions. The reader is invited to see the act of reading itself as a form of insurrection.
Readers should attend to the novel's layered ironies: the narrator's deadpan delivery, the gap between characters' self-perception and their actions, and the way sacred texts are treated as literature to be analyzed rather than obeyed. France's targets include not only religion but also the secular institutions—law, family, state—that inherit its authority. The revolt of the angels is, finally, a revolt of the mind against every form of unexamined power.
I finished The Revolt of the Angels the other evening, and it left me oddly homesick for something simpler. Its grand celestial arguments reminded me, strangely, of a quiet afternoon spent reading The Ranch Girls at Rainbow Lodge — Story, Setting & Ideas—not for the plot, but for the gentle trust in ordinary things. Both left me thinking about what we choose to obey.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
Your personal reading reflection
Build a private reading journal entry for this title.